The IRS expects to issue guidance on the Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction in July, Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter has said. Kautter outlined the timeline of various guidance proposals at the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation May Meeting in Washington, D.C.

The IRS expects to issue guidance on the Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction in July, Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter has said. Kautter outlined the timeline of various guidance proposals at the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation May Meeting in Washington, D.C.

Proposed Guidance
More specifically, the proposed guidance on the passthrough deduction is expected to be released by the end of July, an IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer on May 15. "The goal of the guidance is to get things out that are complete," the IRS spokesperson said, reiterating Kautter. "But, it will not cover every question that taxpayers have," the spokesperson added.

Passthrough Deduction
The new passthrough deduction was enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) last December. The new law provides a 20-percent deduction for income from passthrough entities. The deduction is limited by certain controversial factors including business activities, wages paid by the business, and property values.

Questions Expected
Generally, Kautter anticipates initial follow-up questions from taxpayers and practitioners after the proposed guidance is released, the IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer. Kautter has said that it would be better to get the guidance out in "fairly good shape," to allow for public comment and input, rather than taking more time to draft the guidance internally, according to several reports. Kautter has reportedly said that not everyone may agree with that approach, but that a "better product" will likely be created because of it.

Congressional lawmakers on Capitol Hill continue to focus on tax reform. Republicans and Democrats alike have been discussing the effects of tax reform, albeit reaching different conclusions.

Congressional lawmakers on Capitol Hill continue to focus on tax reform. Republicans and Democrats alike have been discussing the effects of tax reform, albeit reaching different conclusions.

Tax Reform Hearings
The Ways and Means Committee held a hearing during the week of May 14, marking the first in a series of upcoming committee hearings on tax reform. The Ways and Means hearings are each expected to examine the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97).

Small Businesses. Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee Chairman Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., has announced the second tax reform hearing in the series is scheduled for May 23. The subcommittee hearing is expected to focus on the TCJA’s impact on small businesses.

Senate. The Senate Finance Committee (SFC) examined early impressions of the TCJA in a hearing last month. SFC Chairman Hatch, R-Utah has indicated to Wolters Kluwer that he is also currently examining House proposals to reform the IRS.

TCJA Criticism
Meanwhile, Ways and Means Democrats remain united in their opposition against the new tax law. Ranking member Richard Neal, D-Mass., released a Democratic Progress Report which details areas in which Democrats believe the TCJA has fallen short.

The Republican tax law has not put the middle class first or provided relief for small businesses, the progress report notes. Rather, it has provided large " tax cuts to big corporations and wealthy executives," the report added.

Additionally, Democrats have criticized the TCJA for significantly adding to the federal deficit. Neal called the new law "fiscally irresponsible,"during a Ways and Means hearing held during the week of May 14.

However, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., called Democratic tax policy ideas and criticisms of the TCJA "bizarre," during a May 17 press briefing. Democrats are in "denial" about the "thriving economy," according to Ryan.

"If you saw yesterday’s Ways and Means hearing, Democrats are still using the same old doom-and-gloom talk that they were using six months ago," Ryan said. "It was bizarre before, and it is even more bizarre now, when Democrats are openly calling for tax increases, which will do nothing but harm our economy," he added.

To that end, several House Democrats have called for raising the corporate tax rate, including certain Ways and Means members during the full committee hearing. Under the TCJA, the corporate tax rate was lowered from 35 to 21 percent.

Senate
Likewise, Senate Democrats across the Capitol have proposed raising the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. Additionally, in a proposal released by Senate Democrats in March, the top individual tax rate would be reinstated to 39.6 percent. Under the TCJA, the top individual tax rate was lowered to 37 percent. These tax rate increases would pay for a $1 trillion infrastructure plan, according to the Democratic proposal.

Ways and Means Open Seat
In related news, Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, may be eyeing a seat in the House’s tax writing committee. The House Steering Committee has recommended Wenstrup to serve as a member of the Ways and Means Committee. Wenstrup is a doctor, war veteran, and small business owner. He would replace Rep. Patrick Meehan, R-Pa., who resigned last month.

The IRS’s "Achilles’ heel" is using outdated software originating from the 1960s, Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter told Senate lawmakers. Kautter and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified in a May 22 Senate Appropriations Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee hearing.

The IRS’s "Achilles’ heel" is using outdated software originating from the 1960s, Acting IRS Commissioner David Kautter told Senate lawmakers. Kautter and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin testified in a May 22 Senate Appropriations Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee hearing.

System Shut Down
2.3 million cyber attacks are launched against the IRS each day, one million of which are sophisticated, Kautter told Senate appropriators. Kautter and Mnuchin testified before the Subcommittee on the Trump Administration’s fiscal year (FY) 2019 Treasury and IRS budget request.

Underscoring the numerous cyber threats against the IRS is its antiquated technology systems currently in use, Kautter said. "59 percent of IRS hardware and 32 percent of IRS software is obsolete," Kautter told Senate appropriators.

Tax Day Glitch. However, the outdated technology at the IRS was not the cause of the partial system shut down that occurred this year on Tax Day, April 17. For eleven hours, certain taxpayers were unable to electronically submit payments through the IRS’s Direct Pay feature. The particular hardware that failed on Tax Day, however, is only a year-and-a-half old, Kautter said.

Five-Year Plan
The IRS and Treasury are currently crafting a new five-year plan to update the IRS’s information technology (IT) systems, both Kautter and Mnuchin testified. A preliminary draft of the plan is expected within 90 days, Mnuchin said.

"The IRS has not done a good job in the past with regard to its technology dollars," Kautter said. However, the leadership team at the IRS is new, energetic, and knowledgeable, and will thus render a different result, he added.

Tax Reform
Technology is the most time consuming and expensive aspect of tax reform implementation, according to Kautter. Additionally, Kautter expects that guidance on all major aspects of tax reform under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) will be out by fall. Recently, Kautter said that proposed guidance on the Code Sec. 199A pass-through deduction will be released in July.

Tax Gap
"In 2016, IRS estimated that the average annual gross tax gap—the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid on time—was $458 billion for tax years 2008-2010," Subcommittee Chairman James Lankford, R-Okla. said during his opening statement. However, the tax gap is most attributable to the "cash" economy, Kautter told lawmakers.

"An individual taxpayer making more than $1 million a year is seven times more likely to be audited than a taxpayer making under $200,000 a year," Kautter said. "The problems with the tax gap tend to be in the cash economy."

Budget
The Trump Administration’s FY 2019 budget request proposes a total of $12.3 billion for Treasury’s operations and bureaus. The budget request proposes $11.135 billion in IRS funding. This figure for the IRS includes "savings and reductions" of $24.5 million compared to the FY 2018 enacted levels, according to Kautter.

The FY 2019 budget request allocates IRS funding for the following:

• taxpayer services: $2.24 billion;
• operations support: $4.16 billion;
• enforcement: $4.63 billion; and
• business systems modernization: $110 million.

The Treasury Department and the IRS, along with the Department of Labor and the Department of Health and Human Services, issued a notice of clarification to more thoroughly explain their decision not to adopt recommendations made by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and certain other commenters regarding T.D. 9744. The challenged regulations govern the coverage of emergency services by group health plans and health insurance issuers under the ACA’s copayment and coinsurance limitations.

The Treasury Department and the IRS, along with the Department of Labor and the Department of Health and Human Services, issued a notice of clarification to more thoroughly explain their decision not to adopt recommendations made by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and certain other commenters regarding T.D. 9744. The challenged regulations govern the coverage of emergency services by group health plans and health insurance issuers under the ACA’s copayment and coinsurance limitations.

The ACEP had sued the federal government over the final regulations, which were issued in 2015 under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) ( P.L. 111-148). Among other things, ACEP argued that the federal government did not adequately respond to their public comments regarding the regulations. On August 31, 2017, the court sent the matter back to the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury to respond to the public comments from ACEP.

Greatest of Three Regulations
Under T.D. 9744, a plan or issuer satisfies the copayment and coinsurance limitations in the statute if it provides benefits for out-of-network emergency services in an amount equal to the greatest of three possible amounts:

• the amount negotiated with in-network providers for the emergency service furnished;
• the amount for the emergency service calculated using the same method the plan generally uses to determine payments for out-of-network services (such as the usual, customary, and reasonable charges), but substituting the in-network cost-sharing provisions for the out-of-network cost sharing provisions; or
• the amount that would be paid under Medicare for the emergency service.

Each of these amounts is calculated excluding any in-network copayment or coinsurance imposed with respect to the participant, beneficiary, or enrollee. This is sometimes referred to as the "Greatest of Three" or the "GOT" regulation because it sets a floor on the amount that nongrandfathered group health plans, and health insurance issuers offering nongrandfathered group or individual health insurance coverage, are required to pay for out-of-network emergency services under this provision at the greatest of the three listed amounts.

Clarification of Regulations
In their clarification, the departments state that the regulations provide a reasonable and transparent methodology to determine appropriate payments by nongrandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers offering nongrandfathered group or individual health insurance coverage for out-of-network emergency services. In addition, the departments maintain that ACEP and other commenters did not provide adequate information to support their assertion that the methods used for determining the minimum payment for out-of-network emergency services under the GOT regulation are not sufficiently transparent or reasonable.

The IRS has issued a new five-year strategic plan to guide its programs and operations and to help meet the changing needs of taxpayers and members of the tax community. "Providing service to taxpayers is a vital part of the IRS mission and the new Strategic Plan lays out a vision of ways to help improve our tax system," remarked IRS Acting Commissioner David Kautter.

The IRS has issued a new five-year strategic plan to guide its programs and operations and to help meet the changing needs of taxpayers and members of the tax community. "Providing service to taxpayers is a vital part of the IRS mission and the new Strategic Plan lays out a vision of ways to help improve our tax system," remarked IRS Acting Commissioner David Kautter.

The Fiscal Year 2018-2022 IRS Strategic Plan focuses on six goals aimed at improving customer service:

• empowering and enabling all taxpayers to meet their tax obligations;
• protecting the integrity of the tax system by encouraging compliance through administering and enforcing the tax code;
• proactively collaborating with external partners to improve tax administration;
• cultivating a well-equipped, diverse, flexible and engaged workforce;
• advancing data access, usability and analytics to inform decision-making and improve operational outcomes; and
• driving increased agility, efficiency, effectiveness and security in IRS operations.

The Service further urged taxpayers to be aware of their fundamental rights under the Taxpayer Bill of Rights when dealing with the IRS.

The IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) Division has identified and selected six additional compliance campaigns. The IRS previously announced 13 campaigns on January 31, 2017, followed by an additional 11 on November 3, 2017, and five more on March 13, 2018. These campaigns help LB&I move in the direction of issue-based examinations. In addition, a compliance campaign process helps the organization decide which compliance issues present risks and the best way to respond to such risks.

The IRS Large Business and International (LB&I) Division has identified and selected six additional compliance campaigns. The IRS previously announced 13 campaigns on January 31, 2017, followed by an additional 11 on November 3, 2017, and five more on March 13, 2018. These campaigns help LB&I move in the direction of issue-based examinations. In addition, a compliance campaign process helps the organization decide which compliance issues present risks and the best way to respond to such risks.

The additional campaigns were identified through LB&I data analysis, and suggestions from IRS employees. LB&I’s goal is to improve return selection, identify issues representing a risk of noncompliance, and make the greatest use of limited resources.

The six campaigns selected for the rollout are:

• Interest Capitalization for Self-Constructed Assets;
• F3520/3520-A Non-Compliance and Campus Assessed Penalties;
• Forms 1042/1042-S Compliance;
• Nonresident Alien Tax Treaty Exemptions;
• Nonresident Alien Schedule A and Other Deductions; and
• NRA Tax Credits.

The campaigns themselves fall within the Withholding & International Individual Compliance practice area.

The IRS intends to provide guidance on the new information reporting obligations for certain life insurance contract transactions under Code Sec. 6050Y. The proposed regulations will provide guidance on the modifications to the transfer for valuable consideration rules for life insurance contracts under Code Sec. 101(a). In addition, the IRS has delayed the reporting requirements under Code Sec. 6050Y until the final regulations are issued.

The IRS intends to provide guidance on the new information reporting obligations for certain life insurance contract transactions under Code Sec. 6050Y. The proposed regulations will provide guidance on the modifications to the transfer for valuable consideration rules for life insurance contracts under Code Sec. 101(a). In addition, the IRS has delayed the reporting requirements under Code Sec. 6050Y until the final regulations are issued.

Transfers for Value Rules
For transfers after December 31, 2017, the exceptions to the transfer for value rules do not apply to the transfer of a life insurance contract, or any interest in such a contract, that is a reportable policy sale. Thus, some portion of the death benefit ultimately payable under the contract may be includable in income. A "reportable policy sale" means the acquisition of an interest in a life insurance contract, directly or indirectly, if the acquirer has no substantial family, business, or financial relationship with the insured apart from the acquirer’s interest in the life insurance contract. A "reportable death benefit" is an amount paid at the death of the insured under a life insurance contract that was transferred in a reportable policy sale.

Reporting Requirements Delayed
The new reporting requirements of Code Sec. 6050Y apply to reportable death benefits paid and reportable policy sales made after December 31, 2017. However, the transition guidance delays any reporting under Code Sec. 6050Y until final regulations are issued.

Under Code Sec. 6050Y, information returns must be filed in the following situations:

• By anyone who acquires a life insurance contract, or any interest in a life insurance contract, in a reportable policy sale;
• By an issuer of a life insurance contract upon notice of a transaction required to be reported above, or upon any notice of a transfer of a life insurance contract, or any interest in a life insurance contract, to a foreign person; and
• By any payor of reportable death benefits.

Proposed Regulations
The proposed regulations will describe the manner by which and time at which the reporting requirements of Code Sec. 6050Y must be satisfied. They will also clarify which parties are subject to the reporting requirements and other definitional issues. For example, Treasury and the IRS intend to define the term "reportable policy sale" in the proposed regulations to include a viatical settlement. In addition, the proposed regulations will clarify the extent to which Code Sec. 6050Y applies to sales or acquisitions effected by transferors and transferees outside the United States, and to sellers and issuers that are foreign persons for purposes of these reporting rules.

The IRS is requesting public comment on the intended proposed regulations implementing these reporting requirements.

Special Report

President Signs Sweeping Tax Overhaul Into Law

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) has been approved by Congress and signed by President Trump. After a last-minute procedural glitch that required the Senate to vote first on the final bill, the most sweeping change to the U.S. tax code in decades cleared the Senate, 51 to 48, in the early morning hours of December 20, followed by House approval, 224 to 201, later the same day. President Trump signed the bill into law at the White House on December 22, 2017.

Special Report

President Signs Sweeping Tax Overhaul Into Law

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) has been approved by Congress and signed by President Trump. After a last-minute procedural glitch that required the Senate to vote first on the final bill, the most sweeping change to the U.S. tax code in decades cleared the Senate, 51 to 48, in the early morning hours of December 20, followed by House approval, 224 to 201, later the same day. President Trump signed the bill into law at the White House on December 22, 2017.

H.R. 1, as approved by Congress, impacts virtually every individual and business on a level not seen in over 30 years. As with any tax bill, however, there will be "winners" and "losers." This historic bill calls for lowering the individual and corporate tax rates, repealing countless tax credits and deductions, enhancing the child tax credit, boosting business expensing, and more. The bill also impacts the Affordable Care Act (ACA), effectively repealing the individual shared responsibility requirement. Most provisions are effective starting in 2018.

INDIVIDUALS

Tax Rates

H.R. 1 carries temporary tax rates of 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35, and 37 percent after 2017. Under prior law, individual income tax rates have been 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35, and 39.6 percent.

Standard Deduction

H.R. 1 nearly doubles the standard deduction. It increases the standard deduction to $24,000 for married individuals filing a joint return, $18,000 for head-of-household filers, and $12,000 for all other individuals, indexed for inflation (using chained CPI) for tax years beginning after 2018. All increases are temporary, starting in 2018 but ending after December 31, 2025. Under prior law, the standard deduction for 2018 had been set at $13,000 for joint filers, $9,550 for heads of households, and $6,500 for all other filers. The additional standard deduction for the elderly and the blind ($1,300 for married taxpayers, $1,600 for single taxpayers) is retained.

Deductions and Credits

H.R. 1 makes significant changes to some popular individual credits and deductions, effective starting in 2018. Many of the changes, however, are temporary, generally ending after 2025, in order to keep overall revenue costs for the new law within budgetary constraints.

Mortgage interest deduction. The new law limits the mortgage interest deduction to interest on $750,000 of acquisition indebtedness ($375,000 in the case of married taxpayers filing separately), in the case of tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and beginning before January 1,2026. For acquisition indebtedness incurred before December 15, 2017, the new law allows current homeowners to keep the current limitation of $1 million ($500,000 in the case of married taxpayers filing separately).

The new law also allows taxpayers to continue to include mortgage interest on second homes, but within those lower dollar caps. However, no interest deduction will be allowed for interest on home equity indebtedness.

State and local taxes. The new law limits annual itemized deductions for all nonbusiness state and local taxes deductions, including property taxes, to $10,000 ($5,000 for married taxpayer filing a separate return). Sales taxes may be included as an alternative to claiming state and local income taxes.

Miscellaneous itemized deductions. The new law temporarily repeals all miscellaneous itemized deductions that are subject to the two-percent floor under current law.

Medical expenses. The new law temporarily enhances the medical expense deduction. It lowers the threshold for the deduction to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI) for tax years 2017 and 2018.

Family Incentives

The new law temporarily increases the current child tax credit from $1,000 to $2,000 per qualifying child. Up to $1,400 of that amount would be refundable. It also raises the adjusted gross income phaseout thresholds, starting at adjusted gross income of $400,000 for joint filers ($200,000 for all others).

The child tax credit is further modified to provide for a $500 nonrefundable credit for qualifying dependents other than qualifying children.

Education

The new law retains the student loan interest deduction. It also modifies section 529 plans and ABLE accounts. It does not overhaul the American Opportunity Tax Credit, as proposed in the original House bill. The new law also does not repeal the exclusion for interest on U.S. savings bonds used for higher education, as proposed in the House bill.

Alimony

The new law repeals the deduction for alimony payments and their inclusion in the income of the recipient.

Retirement

The new law generally retains the current rules for 401(k) and other retirement plans. However, it repeals the rule allowing taxpayers to recharacterize Roth IRA contributions as traditional IRA contributions to unwind a Roth conversion. Rules for hardship distributions are modified, among other changes.

Federal Estate Tax

The new law follows the original Senate bill in not repealing the estate tax, but rather doubling the estate and gift tax exclusion amount for estates of decedents dying and gifts made after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. The generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption is also doubled.

Alternative Minimum Tax

The new law retains the alternative minimum tax (AMT) for individuals with modifications. It temporarily increases (through 2025) the exemption amount to $109,400 for joint filers ($70,300 for others, except trusts and estates). The new law also raises the exemption phase-out levels so that the AMT will apply to an income level of $1 million for joint filers ($500,000 for others). These amounts are all subject to annual inflation adjustment.

Affordable Care Act

The new law repeals the Affordable Care Act (ACA) individual shared responsibility requirement, making the payment amount $0. This change is effective for penalties assessed after 2018.

Carried Interest

Under the new law, the holding period for long-term capital gains is increased to three years with respect to certain partnership interests transferred in connection with the performance of services.

BUSINESSES

Corporate Taxes

H.R. 1 calls for a 21-percent corporate tax rate beginning in 2018. The new law makes the new rate permanent. The maximum corporate tax rate currently tops out at 35 percent.

Under the new law, the 80-percent and 70-percent dividends received deductions under current law are reduced to 65-percent and 50-percent, respectively. It also repeals the AMT on corporations.

Bonus Depreciation

H.R. 1 increases the 50-percent "bonus depreciation" allowance to 100 percent for property placed in service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023 (January 1, 2024, for longer production period property and certain aircraft). A 20-percent phase-down schedule would then kick in. It also removes the requirement that the original use of qualified property must commence with the taxpayer, thus allowing bonus depreciation on the purchase of used property.

Vehicle Depreciation

The new law raises the cap placed on depreciation write-offs of business-use vehicles. The new caps will be $10,000 for the first year a vehicle is placed in service (up from a current level of $3,160); $16,000 for the second year (up from $5,100); $9,600 for the third year (up from $3,050); and $5,760 for each subsequent year (up from $1,875) until costs are fully recovered. The provision is effective for property placed in service after December 31, 2017, in taxable years ending after such date.

Section 179 Expensing

The new law enhances Code Sec. 179 expensing. The Conference bill sets the Code Sec. 179 dollar limitation at $1 million and the investment limitation at $2.5 million.

Deductions and Credits

Numerous business tax preferences are eliminated. These include the Code Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction, non-real property like-kind exchanges, and more. Additionally, the rules for business meals are revised, as are the rules for the rehabilitation credit.

The new law leaves the research and development credit in place, but requires five-year amortization of research and development expenditures. It also creates a temporary credit for employers paying employees who are on family and medical leave.

Interest Deductions

The new law generally caps the deduction for net interest expenses at 30 percent of adjusted taxable income, among other criteria. Exceptions exist for small businesses, including an exemption for businesses with average gross receipts of $25 million or less.

Pass-Through Businesses

Currently, up to the end of 2017, owners of partnerships, S corporations, and sole proprietorships – as "pass-through" entities – pay tax at the individual rates, with the highest rate at 39.6 percent. The original House bill proposed a 25-percent tax rate for certain pass-through income after 2017, with a nine-percent rate for certain small businesses. The original Senate bill generally would have allowed a temporary deduction in an amount equal to 23 percent of qualified income of pass-through entities, subject to a number of limitations and qualifications.

H.R. 1 generally follows the Senate's approach to the tax treatment of pass-through income, but with some changes, including a reduction in the percentage of the deduction allowable under the provision to 20 percent (not 23 percent), a reduction in the threshold amount above which both the limitation on specified service businesses and the wage limit are phased in, and a modification in the wage limit applicable to taxpayers with taxable income above certain threshold amounts.

Net Operating Losses

The new law modifies current rules for net operating losses (NOLs). Generally, NOLs will be limited to 80 percent of taxable income for losses arising in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. It also denies the carryback for NOLs in most cases while providing for an indefinite carryforward, subject to the percentage limitation.

ENERGY

The original House bill called for repealing many current energy tax incentives, including the credit for plug-in electric vehicles. Other energy tax preferences, such as the residential energy efficient property credit, would have been modified. The new law retains the credit for plug-in electric vehicles and did not adopt any of the other repeals of or modifications to energy credits from the House bill.

EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS

The new law does not modify or repeal the so-called "Johnson amendment." This provision generally restricts Code Sec. 501(c)(3) organizations from political campaign activity.

IRS ADMINISTRATION

H.R. 1 extends from nine months to two years the period for bringing a civil action for wrongful levy. The new law does not prohibit increases in IRS user fees, as proposed by the original Senate bill.

INTERNATIONAL

The new law moves the United States to a territorial system. It creates a dividend-exemption system for taxing U.S. corporations on the foreign earnings of their foreign subsidiaries when the earnings are distributed. The foreign tax credit rules are modified, as are the Subpart F rules. The look-through rule for related controlled foreign corporations are made permanent, among other changes.

Repatriation

A portion of deferred overseas-held earnings and profits (E&P) of subsidiaries will be taxed at a reduced rate of 15.5 percent for cash assets and 8 percent for illiquid assets. Foreign tax credit carryforwards will be fully available and foreign tax credits triggered by the deemed repatriation would be partially available to offset the U.S. tax.